 |
 112 Seeds |  73 Peers |
|
Users review: I will examine the content of the film in detail, but to give an idea of ​​how to approach the film. I consider myself Tolkienist (I actually saw this movie on opening, because I sustained improvement agreement with the local theater I spent four hours in the north of the letter names of the people in the Elven writing) This is to be expected that many fans of the original book that this film as a swollen, distorted monster written version of the story they love. It is important to understand before going in that this is not just a movie about the book. This Jackson's Hobbit, Tolkiens not, and they are best considered as a separate product. They represent a variety of media, from different centuries and partly different target groups. Children's book was written before Tolkien and had no idea of ​​the great trilogy of monitoring; Jackson made Lord of the Rings trilogy, and of course trying to make a few PREQUELS remind him to tone and scope.One could argue that Jackson's Hobbit trilogy, when completed, create a film trilogy VC much better than ordinary children Tolkiens literary book raises VC. (Changing the tone of the book for children great epic, very noticeable even play for those who are trying to read The Hobbit after VC.) By the way, Jackson prequel trilogy, probably will not mess up ML trilogy Star Wars PREQUELS way to provide important points of the plot of the original film. When finished, Jacksons six-earth movies can be viewed in a number of profitable domestic chronologi.To be assured Jackson's Hobbit trilogy based on the 1930 children's book in the sense that the characters have the same names and see almost the same place in a few (though adding new characters and locations) in the same order. Their main motives are also the same. But other than that, do not expect much loyalty. There is almost nothing that is not well designed and decorated, mainly to ensure the much darker tone and more fantasy action (ie fighting). Spiders from Liholesie here fit really horror of their children fairly pure literary analogues (where we Bilbo offends them silli rhymes Attercop). Wizards conflict Necromancer of Dol Huldur that the book takes place entirely behind the scenes and only briefly mentioned when Gandalf came back towards the end, it really showed. This is understandable; Gandalf would otherwise be completely absent for most of the film. In addition, Jackson audience will already know that this is the beginning of the war with Sauron and all major Dark Lord could well be ignored. Tolkien in his letters cited as Sauron cast a fleeting shadow in the pages of The Hobbit; Jackson film in the shade darker and deeper.Entire new subplot freely created and added to the story. Elf Tauriel, and it is unlikely to catch one of the dwarfs clearly designed to add a love story in which the book does not have one, and at least one strong female character (does not apply Tolkiens when he wrote stories for children in 1930). continued survival of all the main characters, despite their endless brushes with death, not only to strain credibility - completely ejected and destroys trust. We stayed with the action FANTASI literally have to be available for choreography, not security. If a cat has nine lives, Jackson's Dwarf certainly enjoyed three number lives.So, when viewed as a stand-alone product, it is a good film? Technically, this is nothing but brilliant, details of which can be assessed only on the big screen. Smog is hands down the best movie dragon developed world has ever seen. If I was a teenager instead of a mature 42, has a wealth of fantasy action will probably be me no end. It's nice to see Legolas again, even if it's not in the book. I'm ...
| Language: English Runtime: 161 min Audio: Dual Audio Frame Rate: 25 fps Video Bitrate: 2924 Kb/sec Audio Bitrate: 384 kbps |
